From relder@space.mit.edu Tue Jan 7 13:14:17 1997 Received: from space.mit.edu by wiwaxia AA13769; Tue, 7 Jan 97 13:14:16 EST Received: from Mac-mailer (NE80AT6B-DYN-03.MIT.EDU) by space.mit.edu AA08953; Tue, 7 Jan 97 13:14:15 EST Date: Tue, 07 Jan 97 13:13:58 EST From: relder@space.mit.edu (Dick Elder) To: dd@space.mit.edu Subject: Dim gratings Cc: mm@space.mit.edu Status: R Listed below are the dimmest of the gratings. (The detector bias voltages are from the Postvibration test however it doesn't change much with time) Location Detector Bias PostVib_roll_error 3A7 0.37 0.28 3A1 0.47 0.05 1FF3 0.57 -0.07 1FF8 0.71 -0.18 1A2 0.79 0.38 1FF9 0.85 -0.18 1B8 0.86 0.61 1B7 0.88 -0.52 3FF6 0.89 -0.25 3FF4 0.90 -0.19 1FF6 0.91 -0.22 3A6 0.93 0.08 3B6 0.95 0.14 1B5 0.95 0.10 1A6 1.01 -0.20 1FF1 1.01 -0.20 1FF7 1.03 -0.56 3FF5 1.07 0.87 1B6 1.07 0.52 1FF2 1.07 -0.26 3B3 1.08 0.89 1A1 1.09 -0.40 The following list shows the time spent working on the grating during initial alignment. Not all gratings are evaluated here because the data is determined by subtracting alignment completion times. This is somewhat of a stability indicator because the gratings with longer time usually had greater sensitivity and variation in sensitivity to roll induced by pressure of the two alignment fingers. Location Elapsed_time 3FF2 0:32:41 1B4 0:27:36 6FF1 0:21:11 4B1 0:17:03 4B3 0:16:48 3A7 0:15:41 3EE7 0:15:32 4FF6 0:13:45 1A1 0:13:37 6EE4 0:13:36 1A2 0:13:36 3A4 0:12:41 3EE4 0:12:35 6A2 0:12:25 1A3 0:12:24 4A5 0:12:19 4A4 0:12:12 6A4 0:12:09 6B4 0:11:41 1EE7 0:11:36 6FF4 0:11:20 1EE4 0:11:18 1B5 0:10:52 3B4 0:10:33 4A7 0:10:17 1B8 0:10:16 3B2 0:10:14 Listed below are gratings which showed slightly erratic behavior. The gratings in sector A and B behaved well compared to these. 3EE2 .8 jump preglue, -.6 jump postvib 3EE3 -.8 jump at postvib 3EE4 -.8 jump at postvib 1FF7 -.6 jump at postviba Sectors A and B looked nice and stable. Dick